Tag: backpacking

  • Stoves for Backpacking

    A portable stove enables you to cook nearly anywhere. Most stoves burn clean which makes cleanup easy. While a stove will add weight to your pack, the combination of a stove and foods which you cook are often lighter than ready to eat foods. Cooked food typically provide more energy than raw food.  Boiling water is an effective purification method. In cold locales, stoves are used to melt snow for drinking water. You only need to get the water to 160F to purify it. People do a full boil to be sure they are safe but this wastes fuel. When there are a few bubbles forming the water is around 175F.  You can get all the water to 212F (100C) producing significant steam, but you should know that getting water to phase change to steam takes an extra amount of energy. Some minor updates to this post April 2023.

    My Choice

    I use a gram cracker stove for esbits with a UL Caldera Cone system for all my solo trips except when fire regulation forbid it. When traveling internationally or thru hikes where I am resupplying on the fly I go back to alcohol due to the ease of acquiring fuel. I have used a Snowpeak GigaPower GS-100 canister stove (my review) since 2001 on solo trips when regulations require a “off” valve, and on group trips because it is easy to use, more powerful than alcohol, and simmers well. It’s also a good stove to using in an enclosed space because it produces much less carbon monoxide than most stoves. I am no longer doing hardcore winter trips so no longer have a stove that is ideal for large scale snow melting.

    Factors to Consider

    Stoves should be evaluated based on a number of factors: step in weight (stove + fuel container), weight for the length of your trip factoring in fuel efficiency, accessibility of fuel, operating environment restrictions, need for simmering (flame control), initial cost, and cost of operating.

    Stoveweight vs Time Over 14 Days provides a useful graph which can help you appreciate how the step-in weight and fuel efficiency can effect carry weight. If you don’t want to use a Flash plug-in, Jim’s gas-vs-alcohol provides a similar analysis in written form. If you want to model out all stove / fuel weight options check out the light-weight stove calculator.

    TSA regulations prohibited stove fuel in both carry-on and check thru which means if you are flying, you need to make sure you can easily acquire your fuel between touching down in the plane and getting to the trail head. Either plan to purchase fuel on the way to your trailhead, have someone pick up fuel for you, or mail your fuel via ground transportation to a dropbox. If you are traveling outside your home country, check out international fuel names and how to find meth spirits.

    If you are planning to use a stove inside a contained area (say a tent) learn about the dangers of carbon monoxide. There is a six part series Stoves, Tents, Carbon Monoxide which provides a deep dive into this topic (summary: use a Colman Xtreme stove, or a canister stove with side burners like the Snowpeak GS-100)… or have a chimney.

    Canister Stoves

    Canister stoves seem to be the most popular stove among backpackers.  For most of this section we will discuss stoves that use the standard Lindal-valve. Smaller canister stoves are reasonable light (stove + empty canister ~6oz), easy to start, easy to use, don’t tend to flair up, simmer well, burns clean, and are more fuel efficient that other options. They operate well in three season conditions (in colder conditions, say <40F keep the canister in sleeping bag and they are fine).

    The downside of upright canister stoves are they don’t function well in below freezing conditions (can work down to -25F with a Moulder Strip), most have sub-standard performance in wind (flatcatgear ocelet helps), it is hard to get additional canisters in some locations, and the fuel is expensive. It’s a pain not to know how much fuel is in the canister. You can shake it (imprecise) or check its weight (not practical on the trail). Finally, there is the question what to do with partial canisters, though something like the GasSaver lets you transfer fuel between canisters.

    Altitude does not significantly impact the performance of the canister stoves except pizo-electric starters tend to have problem above 9k ft… use a match or a flint based sparker. I don’t think canister availability should be an issue unless you are on trip which doesn’t have reliable re-supply ever couple of weeks.

    There are numerous stoves sold today. The best and more comprehensive review I have seen is BPL’s Upright Canister Stove Testing and Review from 2019. Based on their reviews, my personal experience, and the experience of good friends I would recommend three stoves, and one with a cautionary note.

    • Soto Windmaster has won number polls of experienced backpackers and gear reviewers. It has a regulator which should theoretically allow it to effectively function when the pressure in the canister is low, a big plus when it’s cold or your canister is almost empty. In practice, I have not seen it provide significant performance improvements, but I haven’t done extensive testing to measure this. Much better in wind than the vast majority of canister stoves.
    • MSR Pocket Rocket Deluxe continued to be on everyone’s recommended list. Easy to find in stores, good performance in the wind. For whatever reason this stove never “grabbed me”, but it’s a very good option.
    • Kovea Spider weights 2-3x more than the typical “top of the canister” stove, but those extra 3-4oz give a lot in return. It is significantly more effective in sub-freezing conditions. The fuel line pre-heats the fuel insuring that all your fuel will be usable. It’s also more stable with larger pots and can be used with a full windshield without danger of overheating the canister. 
    • BSR 3000T stove is significantly cheaper that the stoves listed above, the pot arms reportedly sometimes warp but I have not personally witnessed this.

    There are a number of integrated Pot/Stove styles. JetBoil was the first company with these sorts of stove and has a larger variety of options. I think this is an interesting system, but the step-in weight is sufficiently high that even with it’s higher fuel efficiently, none of the JetBoil stoves systems is able to beat my canister stove + pot + fuel for total carry weight when being used is real (read windy) conditions, and I don’t like being locked into one pot. A nice alternative is the Ocelot windscreen from FlatCat Gear which can combine a heat exchange mug with several of the stoves listed above producing a system which is more fuel efficient that most of the commercial integrated systems AND is easily removed allowing you to use a variety of pots with your stove.

    The small Snow Peak fuel canister a listed as weighting 7oz: 4oz of fuel, 3oz of container. My experience is that they weight 210g full, and 86 grams empty. I find the fuel runs full out for approx 40 minutes in many stoves, which is enough to boil 7 1L pots of water or 12 24oz pots in most conditions. The MSR and Primos fuel canisters will run twice as long. Primos makes “jumbo” a 450g canister which would be useful to someone cooking a lot. You can’t fly with canisters, but you can mail iso butane canisters via surface mail as described in yellowjacket’s canister faq. There are people who refill airhorn canisters to save weight.

    The second canister type is made by Gaz and are rather heavy. They were popular more in Europe than in North America, primarily among car campers. I am not particularly fond of these stoves. I believe the lindal-value isobutane canister stoves are superior in every way.

    Alcohol Stoves

    Alcohol stoves have been the darling of the ultra-light community. Especially popular in the 1970-1990s when their primary competition was heavy white gas stoves. The base weight of an alcohol stove system can be less than ounce, the stoves can be very inexpensive, and have no moving parts to fail.

    Fuel is easy acquired many locations (marine supply stores, hardware stores, paint stores, outdoor stores, automotive stores (HEET) or in some locations that permit >180 proof  Everclear.  Hand sanitizer, typically 70% alcohol, can be an adequate fuel. I like the denatured alcohol  made by Sunnyside best since it’s mostly ethanol which is nicer than methanol but hard to find in California. Alcohol is easy to transport making resupply easy and it burns quietly.

    Alcohol as a fuel has less BTUs / ounce than other fuels commonly used backpacking so if you have a lot of cooking to do (long trips without resupply, melting snow, cooking for lots of people) you would be better served with a different fuel source. Some people express concern with using alcohol at elevation. There might be issues at extreme elevation, but I know of no one who has had trouble using alcohol below 14k ft.  Cold can eventually impact performance but I have found that keeping the fuel in my jacket pocket and using the stove on an insulated mat takes care of any potential issue. It is possible to knock over a running alcohol stove which could be a fire hazard, so some parks ban the use of open stoves during times of high risk of fire.

    Most alcohol stoves do not simmer well, they can just boil water. If you want to do complex cooking you should select a stove which is designed to vary heat output via a simmer ring or other mechanism. Basic “simmering” can be accomplished through the use of a cozy such as those sold by AntiGravityGear or homemade with reflectix.

    A commonly asked question is how much fuel does it take to boil X amount of water. There is not fixed answer for this. The amount of fuel required depends on how much water you boil at one time, the temp of the water,  the fuel efficiency of the stove, how much wind, and the size/shape of the pot. My experience is that the amount of fuel required to boil 16oz (.5L) is somewhere between 0.3 and 1.5 oz of alcohol depending on stove and conditions. Most stoves will be between 0.5-1oz. There was a thread on BPL in 2022 about what is the most fuel efficient alcohol stove?

    Many people make alcohol stoves. Some good designs / sites for people who want to make stoves: stove types by zenjason klass stovessupercat, ion stove, and conical pot stands. I used an Ion stove for several years. It is the most fuel efficient stove I have used… but you had to be patient. I found the it regularly took >14 minutes to get 16oz water to a boiling point.

    If you want to buy a pre-made stove I would recommend one for the Caldera Cone Stove made by Trail Designs. I found them easy to use, stable, fairly efficient, good in wind, and a fairly fast boil time. The kojin stove is an ultralight version of the classic Trangia which can seal in unburned alcohol. If the “cones” aren’t for you, I would recommend looking at  whiteboxstoves which makes a very durable stove which is beloved by many. Brasslite makes stoves which are more durable than most home made stoves and one of their models simmers though it’s not as efficient as some of the other stoves when it comes to boiling water. Vargo make the cool looking Triad which unfortunately performs badly, I would skip it. Back in 2005 BPL wrote up a commercial alcohol stove survey and performance report which is now dated.

    Many people carry alcohol in light weight plastic containers. When people need a lot of fuel, Mountain Dew bottles seems to be popular because they are a different color than containers people drink out of. On shorter trips I use a small 2 oz bottle that Camp Suds came in. On longer trips I used an 8oz Playtpus Lil’ Nipper (no longer made… similar 8oz flask) with a cap from BPL

    Solid Fuel Stoves

    Solid fuel stoves provide structure to burn combustible solids. The most common form of this are esbits stoves which are designed to hold solid fuel tablets off the ground while they burn.  Esbits can be very simple to use, have no risk of spilling, and are fuel / weight efficient. A well design esbits system such as the Caldera Cone Stove made by Trail Designs can bring 16oz of water to boil in 7-8 minutes using less than 15grams of fuel or do two smaller boils. 

    My original experience with esbits was quite negative. I couldn’t get 16 oz of water to boil with the typical esbits stoves. part of the problem was my pot was too far away from the esbits.  I learned that distance between the esbits and port bottom (uses flash, graph here) will impact performance significantly. I also didn’t like that esbits smell a bit like rotten eggs and left a sticky residue / black gunk on pots. I had completed written them off until GVP challenged me to try Caldera Keg which and is now sold by Trail Design. I was amazed at how well this system worked, though I like a more durable pot. I purchased a Trail Designs UL Caldera.  I am able to efficiently bring my 16oz of water to a boil, I could live with the smell, and the residue was manageable. The only downside in my mind now is that they can be hard to light. In the wind it has taken me a minute to start with Bic lighter.

    WetFire is an alternative to esbits and is reportedly lights more easily, burns hotter and cleaner, leaving no residue on the pot. It has been suggested that Weber Lighter Cubes are similar to WetFire, but are larger and significantly cheaper. Some people have found that they could warm water up enough for their needs using 5 gram esbit tablets.

    Typically I bring around 12 ounces of water to boil for my dinner… blow out the esbits. Eat. Relight the esbits, and have enough fuel to 8oz cup of tea. I then use the tea bag is as sponge… I knock off any food particles on the inside of the mug before drinking. The tanic acid in the tea seems to help cut through an oily remnants of dinner so a quick rinse takes care of the inside, and then use the tea bag to remove the esbits residue from the outside of the pot (before it hardens) when I am finished drinking the tea. One downside that is still true… they are more expensive that many of the other options and during fire season are banned in some areas.

    Pressurized Liquid Fuel stoves

    Pressurized Liquid Fuel stoves have been the main stay of camping stoves. Most will burn white gas, many will burn other fuels as well. The step in weight for these stoves is at least 15oz, and in some cases close to two pounds between a heavy stove and fuel bottle. On the other hand, if you have to do a lot of cooking, especially in cold weather, nothing can compare the the large fuel supplies that can be brought to bear. There are a number of multi-fuel pressurized liquid fuel stoves which can burn almost any flammable liquid simplifies re-supply, especially when you are outside Northern America. I haven’t used this type of stove much in since the late 1990s. There was a thread on BPL about most reliable gasoline stoves which would be useful to read.

    The MSR Whisperlite  has been very populate for years… but I am not fond of it. It’s not light, it sounds like a jet engine not a whisper, doesn’t simmer, and can be temperamental. I think the MSR SimmerLite is a much nicer stove (lighter, less temperamental, and simmers well). The faithful MSR XGK has always impressed me with it’s durability, can burn just about any fuel, and it’s ability to function in extreme conditions though it is even louder than the Whisperlite. For multi-fuel stove, a number of people seem to like the more modern MSR Dragon Fly, though there are a number of new entries in this field, including a number which will also run on isobutane canisters.

    I still have a soft spot for the Svea 123 Stove. I know several people who are using the same Svea 123 stove they purchase in the 1960s. The Svea 123 still compares favorably from a fully loaded weight perspective to more “modern” white gas stoves. The Svea 123R doesn’t put out as much heat at some of the modern liquid fuel stoves… so it’s not great for cooking for big groups, but it it quite efficent which makes it nice for solo or use by a couple. There are a number of other companies that make liquid fuel stoves, but since I don’t use them, I haven’t been following them very closely.

    Wood Burning Stoves

    Wood burning fire made from material found on the ground. If you keep the fire small enough for just cooking then in many locations, this is an environmentally friendly way to cook. The down side is that there are places that small fires aren’t recommended either because of the danger of forest fires or that the fuel supply / conditions are not appropriate. There are several designs for small, portable stoves which burn wood.  The fire box in wood burning stoves typically is either steel or titanium because aluminum will melt. My favorite is the Trail Designs Caldera Ti-Tri because it’s light, compact, and versatile. Other commercial backpacking wood stoves include the ganesha, bushbubby stovetrailstove,  makairametal wildwood stoveVargo Hexagon Wood Stove and the heavier littlbug stove. There are several DIY stoves include Nimblewill Nomad StoveGarlington Stoveikea cutlery container stove. An interesting variation is the Sierra Zip Stove stove which uses a small electric fan to drive the fire. If you just want to boil water, Boilerwerks makes a light weight versions of the Kelly Kettle originally popularized by fisherman.  Finally, there are stoves designed for warming shelters in addition to cooking on top of. They have chimneys to vent the carbon monoxide (or other icky stuff) outside the tent. Examples of this include  Ti-goats vortex titanium stoveKifaru. stoves, and chimpac’s Centerpole chimney/stove.

    Solar

    There are a number of companies such as Soltac which make portable, solar powered ovens which can be used to cook food in the back country. These devices typically weight between 10oz and 2lbs and use just sun light for “fuel”. Of course, they are only useful if you have good sun light available and typically take a lot longer than more traditional systems. I don’t recommend these unless you are planning to set up a base camp which will be used for multiple days in a sunny location.

    Flameless

    There are a small number of flameless systems such as what are built into MREs. These systems often use calcium chloride or magnesium sulfate which produce an exothermic reaction When mixed with water. There is no flame, so it can be easily and safely used inside a tent. The downside is typically cost for the heating packets and weight

    Capillary pump stoves

    Vapore invented a technology that was licensed by MSR. It was hoped that  stoves using this technology could use lighter weight fuel canisters and be extremely efficient. Alas, MSR hasn’t produce a viable consumer stove using this technology.

    Additional Information

    BPL StoveBench is a robust protocol for testing stoves. Gear Skeptics video about stove efficiency is interesting (basically low and slow wins) and an interesting discussion which about lids and pasteurizing rather than boiling. There was a discussion about making a database of stove performance on /r/ultralight/. Hikin Jim’s blog Adventures in Stoving is filled with reviews and notes about stove efficiency.

    Random Hint: Boil only the amount of water you need. Have the water in the pot before you light the stove, so you can immediately start heating the water. Use a wind screen. Consider using a pot cozy rather than simmering.

  • Food Storage for Backpacking

    In most parts of the country correctly hanging food in a bear bags can be effective though it takes a bit of skill. Unfortunately bags won’t protect your food in the more highly trafficed parts of the Sierras were the bears see backpackers and think “Great, I get another treat filled piñata tonight”. In the Sierras protect your food and the bears by storing your food in bear boxes or using a bear resistant container such as the BearVault (nice and reasonably priced), Wild Ideas Bearikade (lightest hard wall, and expensive), or the Garcia Backpackers’ Cache (the original which I am not fond of). Bareboxer makes some smaller canisters which are good for short trips. Andrew did a nice analysis of bear canisters volume vs price and price.

    Photon sent a nicely written email to backpackinglight mailing list encouraging people to use canisters in the Sierras.  Andrew Skurka more recently wrote an argument against hanging bear bag. Why use a can?  First, it might save the life of a bear.  Those which get used to raid people’s food will eventually be destroyed.  Second, loosing your food, especially 4 days into a 9 day trip really sucks.

    There are some people who advocate “stealth camping” which is stay away from camp sites that bears habitually visit, cooking your food before you get to your campsite, and sleeping with your food on the theory that a bear will be less likely to bother a human and you will be in a position to defend your food. I don’t recommend this in areas with black bears, and I think anyone is insane to do this in brown bear territory. For extra insurance some stealth campers make sure that smelly things are stored in something like O.P. SAK Barrier bag which look a lot like a normal zip-lock bag, but is in theory, odor-proof. Some people have reported Wallaby Gusset Mylar Bag are cheaper and just as affective.

    Another option Ursack which is basically a stuff sack made from very strong threads. The ursack has been on the “conditionally approved” list periodically, but hasn’t lasted more than a season or two before the get pulled. So I wouldn’t recommend them in places with rigid rules… but they maybe be appropriate and effective in more lay-back areas. Caveat: Ursacks are best when you don’t encounter a bear. If a bear finds the sack it will try to get at your food which will get crushed. This hasn’t happened to me, but I have talked to several people who ended their trip early because their food was a mess after a bear tried to access their Ursack.

    A few years ago there were some portable electrified containers such as the Palisade EST that didn’t make it in the marketplace.

    There isn’t a single organization that is managing bear canister policies in the Sierras anymore, but the is a list of the places that have bear canister requirements in the Sierras.  You can find useful information at the Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee. Eastern Slope Grizzly Bear Group and  USGS Alaska Science Center Bear Project has good information about grizzly safety. There is a nice map of where sierra bear boxes are located.

    Packing Bear Canister

    Lost my notes about packing canisters and food calories / weight. The reddit thread 5.4 days / 16250 calories in a bear boxer made me realize I was missing this information.

  • Hammocks

    I have tried using hammocks several times and never enjoyed the experience. Furthermore, I am near or above tree line which makes hammocks useless.  I would suggest you check out people who love hammocks such as Sgt Rock’s Hammocks 101.

    In warm weather nothing will keep you as cool as a nice hammock. In moderate weather many people find quilt over them. and a aluminized windshield shades under them work well.  In cooler weather you will need more insulation.  My limited experience is that insulation which is adequate for when I was on the ground down to around 30F kept me almost warm enough at 48F in a hammock. The Gossamer Gear Thinlight Pad (1/4 or 3/8″) looks like a good under insulation layer for cool-moderate weather. I won’t recommend the 1/8″ Thinlight because it’s too easy to hole and isn’t stiff enough to stay in place. In colder weather I would encourage considering using an under quilt. There are a variety of companies that make under-quilts.

  • Bivy

    Bivy’s are minimalist shelters which have a footprint no larger than the person they are protecting. They have the advantage of being very quick to set up and have a very low wind profile.

    Full Protection / Waterproof

    In most cases I would not use a waterproof bivy sack. In mild to hot weather they don’t provide enough ventilation for my taste. In winter, moderate to heavy snow fall will compress any insulation inside the bivy and is likely to produce condensation on the inside of the bivy sack.

    In most situations it’s tricky to get in and out of a bivy without letting rain and snow into them.  Of course, there isn’t room inside a bivy to cook, arrange your gear, or do much of anything expect lay there more maybe read. Stand alone bivys tend to weight around 2 lbs. In really harsh weather I would rather carry an extra pound and get a shelter that gives me room to move and a covered access/exit. In more moderate conditions there might be options that are lighter than a bivy, while providing significantly more room and better air flow.

    Personally, I want to be able to sit up fully, lie down fully extended, prop myself up on my elbows and read, and be able set up a bug free space quickly, throw gear in, dive in, and then deploy my pad, unpack my quilt, maybe change clothing and not have to be a contortionist. Bivies just don’t have this sort of room.

    The only situation I think stand-alone bivy sacks shine is in the high alpine (typically climbing) where you need a very small footprint and something that is as low to the ground to minimize the impact of high winds. Maybe I am missing something, since there are people who use bivy as their primary shelter.  You might want to check out The Book of Bivy by Ronald Turnbull for reasons why to use a bivy and the way to make them effective. There is an interesting article about dealing with dealing with condensation in a bivy. Black Diamond, Rab (owns what was Integral Designs), and Outdoor Research seem to make the best regarded bivys. The minimalist MLD FTK Soul Bivy weighting in at 10oz is the lightest fully waterproof bivy I know.

    DWR Bivy

    The classic DWR bivy is often used in conjunction with a down quilt for protection against side winds, spray, and bugs when using a small tarp. . These are often made with a waterproof sil-nylon bottom, and a DWR top such as the Mountain Laurel Design superlight bivy, and Oware Bivy Bag. The down side is that in warm weather they block cooling breezes and don’t provide a lot of room if you want a space protected from flying insects. I use a MLD Superlight Bivy.

    I have really come to like using a DWR bivy combined with a quilt. I am protected from side drafts like a sleep bag and am able to shift the quilt around to let me vent heat. It makes cowboy camping quit easy. I allows me to be in a small footprint space and keeps my quilt from ending up on the ground. When it gets above 60F I prefer some other system because I want more ventilation / air movement so I don’t over heat.

    Bug Shelters

    There are a wide variety of shelters designed to protect against bugs. The lightest weight options are half length, relying on a sleeping bag to protect the lower legs and having something to hang them from. These typically weight around 3-4 ounces such as the simblissity inner peace bug tent. Next up are small, free standing which typically use fiberglass ribs such as the montbell bug sleeping net, the now discontinued A16 bug bivy, and the full size OR Bug Bivy. The freestanding nature makes it easy to use under a tarp, when sleeping under the stars, or in a shelter. I used 1/2 size bivy for a number of years. Generally they worked well. I found three downsides. The first was when it was hot (>70F) my quilt was too warm, but was required to keep the mosquitos off me. I didn’t like to choose between being eaten alive or overheating. I have numerous nights of poor sleep. Second, a few times I picked a slot which was next to an ant hill… and found way too many of the ant marching across my body. One night I ignored them but the other time they drove me crazy and I moved my camp. Finally, when the mosquitos are really out in force I often want to sit down in a bug free space with room to move and maybe feel a breeze.

    Finally there are larger bug shelters, typically designed to fit under a tarp, but can be used stand alone. Most of these shelters are made by the same companies that set flat tarps and shaped tarps. A slight variety of these are tarps which have netting sewn onto the perimeter. This is what I have tended to use.

  • Tents

    Tents are structures made from fabric that provide an enclosed space which protects the occupants from environment conditions. Historically tents were made from canvas, but now are typically made from nylon or polyester with some some of waterproof treatment. Most tents are double walled, though single walled tents are still in use. There are a number of other types of portable shelters.

    In 2025 my recommendation (mostly from other people whom I trust experiences) for 2 person, free standing backpacking tents would be the The Durston Design X-Dome 2. Just 2.7lbs, the space is very usable, easy to pitch, and remarkably weather resistant (especially if you use trekking poles for extra support). The Slingfin Portal-2 is another excellent 2 person which can easily handle 3+ season conditions. For light weight, free standard, 4 seasons, the Slingfin Crossbow 2. Big Agnes Copper Spur 2 Platinum and MSR Hubba Hubba are a bit heavier, not as protective in storms, but can be found in bring-and-mortar stores. A good “budget” tent is the $199 REI Trailmade-2. Generally I recommend tarp-tent shelters. I don’t recommend the Big Agnes Tiger Wall: Yes, it’s just 2 lbs, but it not up to serious weather, and the space is not that usable.

    The rest of this post is fairly out of date, and I have no plans to update it. You would be better to look at other pages.

    Single-wall Tents

    There are two types of single wall tents. The first is made using waterproof (or water resistant) breathable materials. These are typically free standing shelters designed for mountaineering, and have very similar designs such as those from Bibler, Rab, or Black Diamond. I like these sorts of shelters a lot cold, winter conditions, with low humidity. The second type uses waterproof (non-breathable fabrics) and relies on ventilation to keep condensations down. I have yet to find a shelter like this that I like, I think people would often be better served using an ultralight shelter.

    • Integral Designs MK1lite eVENT: 27 sq ft, 3 lb 6oz, $530. A bombproof single-wall mountaineering tent for one (two in an emergency or if you are friendly). Could be event lighter if you use replacement carbon fiber poles (though there have been questions about whether these will stand up to severe wind… I would recommend sticking with the provided poles). I think this is the best solo winter tent ever made. Alas, it was been discontinued (except for industrial purchase) due to concerns of lawsuits since eVENT isn’t fire resistant. Other good alternatives are the slightly less breathable and heavier Integral Designs Mk1 which uses Tegraltex, the Bibler i-tent made with ToddTex, or the BD Firstlight made from EPIC.
    • Black Diamond Superlight Series including a number of models including the nice two person Lighthouse: EPIC canopy/sil nylon floor adaptation of Bibler designs. A bit more breathable than ToddTex and field reports suggest that it is surprisingly water resistant, but it will wet through in an extended storm. I won’t want to use a EPIC tent in a multi-day rain storm.

    MSR and Nemo are making a number of single walled mountaineering tents I have no personal experience with.

    Conventional Double-Walled Tents

    Most people seem to use double-walled tents. Tents give many people a sense of security by providing privacy and a barrier against wind, rain, insects and other small creatures. Having a double wall means that there is a barrier to protect you from brushing against the condensation which will often form on the fly. Double-walled tents that use fabric for the inner body (rather than mesh) are warmer that other shelters because they air between the inner tent and the fly can act as an insulation layer. The downside is most double-walled tents are heavier, can have ventilation problems when the fly is fully shut, and you lose a visual connection to your environment. Most US designed double wall shelters require the inner tent to be set up, and then the fly to be deployed. In a strong rain, this means you can soak your inner tent. Many of the tents from Europe and Australia have a more sensible design that lets you pitch the full structure at once, or pitch the fly and then sent up the inner tent from the inside. See Roger Caffin’s rather harsh, but generally appropriate, Shelter FAQ. While a true tent taxonomy such as found in The Complete Walker IV divides tents into a large number of categories, I will talk about two, very broad categories.

    Free Standing Tents

    The most common double walled tents are free standing wedge and domes. People like these because they tend to be easy to set up, can be moved around, and work well in locations where getting stakes to hold is difficult. The downsides are that they tend to be heavier, don’t ventilate as well, that most of the time you really need to stake down one of these shelter for strength and to prevent the tent from blowing away even if you have gear in them (e.g. freestanding isn’t really true).  There are a lot of other good quality 2 – 4 man free standing tents. I used to consistently prefer Sierra Designs double wall tents to their competitors. For many years, SD really seems to be one of the most innovative main stream companies, makes good trade-offs, and has nice design features. My family has owned several SD tents since the 1970s. We have love each of these tents. These days I think SD still makes good tents, but I don’t immediately assume they will have the best of class. These days Slingfin seems to be making some interesting tents. Popular light weight free standing shelter that I would suggest looking at include:

    • Big Agnes Fly Creek: Would recommend avoiding unless you like cramped space and only encounter moderate weather.
    • Big Agnes  Copper Spur available at a variety of weights / price points. Usable in moderate three season conditions. Light but somewhat fragile.
    • Slingfin Portal: has gotten some excellent reviews as a light weight 2 person, free-standing shelter which can stand up to 3+ season weather.
    • Big Sky Tents: makes some of the lightest, free standing shelters on the market. I would recommend carefully checking what their backlog is before giving these folks business. In the past people have waited months to get their orders delivered.
    • The MSR Hubba (1 person), HubbaHubba (2 person) One of the most popular light weight free standing shelters. More roomy that the Seedhouse, better vestibules than the SD Lightning. Not quite as stable in the wind as the Lightning. I have only check this tent out in stores, I have no field experience. Friends have reported that extra space costs strength in a storm, especially when facing high winds, but they have been happy with this tent. 
    • REI Quarter Dome (T1T2T3) seem to be good, light weight, 3 season, free standard shelters. My friends original 2 person quarter dome wasn’t as stable or well made as my Lightning, it was cheaper and had two vestibules.

    Tunnel / Arch Tents

    Tunnel shelters typically have 2 or 3 arches that provide support. These tents need to be staked to the ground, but often you can get away with 4 stakes except in harsh conditions.  Tunnel tents tend to be longer than an equivalent dome, and require a fairly flat space to get adequately taut pitch.  A well pitched tunnel tent can survive very harsh conditions. If similar materials are used, a tunnel tent tends to be light weight than a dome. Tunnel tents tend to be designed with good ventilation options. Higher quality tunnels designed to handle nasty conditions tend to use equally sized arches. I would recommend staying away from any tunnel tent which uses fiberglass poles since both the poles and the tent are most likely not built to handle harsh conditions.

    • Hilleberg – Make a variety of tunnel tents. Most are designed to stand up to Northern Europe’s winters. Very well made.
    • Stephenson’s Warmlite 2RSW (2 man 42sq ft, 3lb 4oz, <$500) has been one of the lightest tents on the market for years. Warm, very stable in high winds, and handles snow well provided pitched tautly. The vestibules having a floor was a bit annoying because when you enter and exit in the rain/snow because some gets in and doesn’t have anywhere to go. Should note that while it has two walls, the inner wall is not breathable which makes it different from nearly everyone else’s double wall. My experience is that condensation on the inner wall was less than other non breathable single wall shelters.

    Other Tent Designs

    There are a number of light weight shelters that use a single hoop, or trekking poles to form a ridge line, much like some of the ultra light shelters listed above. In general these shelters are not up to facing extreme weather conditions, but they can provide light weight shelter for 3 season conditions many places (4 in places where winters aren’t too harsh).

    • Hilleberg Akto is quite light for a solo four season tent, and is designed to put the fly up first followed by the tent body which is really nice if you are setting up in the rain. Huge amount of space under the vestibule. The tent is a little short for my taste because I can’t sit up without bumping by head and doesn’t handle heavy snow loads well. On the other hand, everyone I have talked to who owns this tent loves it.
    • Terra Nova.Laserlite is a 1+ person tent similar in design to the Akto but weights a mere 34oz including poles while providing more headroom.
    • Tarptent Scarp1 1 person, 2.75lb and Scarp2 1 person, 3.25lb double walled, winter shelters which is somewhat similar to the Hilleberg Akto. An extra 12oz for a pair of poles makes it free-standing.
    • Montbell single pole tents… pole runs across the long axis rather than the short favored by most of the other monopoles.
  • Winter Shelters

    Actually, this should really be called shelters for extreme conditions with snow since there are many places where “winter” could be handled with a traditional “three season” tent.  When I think “winter shelters” I am thinking something that can survive 50+mph winds, and a foot of snow or more falling overnight.  Things that help make shelter survive in the winter:

    • Strong materials.  Often times mountaineering shelters are made from fabric which is 1.5-2x the thickness and strength of similar shelters designed for three season use. Poles are typically thicker and larger diameter.
    • Supported surface area. Ideally support of the shelters walls is evenly spread, across multiple points so that when the wind is blowing or snow is sticking the room, the pressure is distributed through out the shelter. The larger the area without support, the more likely that the shelter will bow in, and that the pressure will be concentrated on a small area which is more likely to fail. For domes you typically want three poles which cross each other.
    • Steep walls so snow slides off rather than accumulating and weighting down the shelter.
    • Aerodynamic shape so winds don’t knock you down
    • Snow skirt which help keep the shelter stable in wind, and also provide continuous support rather than having the support points being the few places that stakes or snow anchors are attached to a shelter.

    I don’t do a lot of winter / snow trips these days. When I was doing more winter trips I used a MLD Duomid for solo trips, and a GoLite pyramid as my multi-person winter shelter. If I was purchasing a hard-core shelter I would likely look at Hilleberg or Macpac tunnel tent or a large pyramid with a titanium wood stove. There was a good thread on BPL about shelters for winter/snow.

    In the winter / snow I have used  a number of shelters over the years.  In reverse chronological order:

    • MLD Duomid (cuben): 1-2 person pyramid design. Good solo shelter with reinforced pullouts.  Ideal for 1.  Usable but tight for 2.
    • GoLite Hex: Very light for space, especially if you dig out snow. Nice flexibility. Light and cheap compared to most 4-season tents. You can dig out a platform which gives you a huge space. Staking can be a bit temperamental to get set up right. I have used it with a sleeping bag cover and just a ground cloth. In more severe conditions really wished it had snow skirt. Some similar tarps are designed to take a small wood stove like Titanium Goat and Kifaru.  In ancient past shared a large pyramid tarp that did have a snow skirt with a pile of other boys.
    • Integral Designs Mk1 (now made by Rab): Loved it as a solo tent. Reasonable weight. Not cheap. Bombproof. More or less same tent is the Bibler i-tent and the BD Firstlight made using EPIC.
    • Hilleberg Nallo2GT – This tent is not the lightest tent, but has a large vestibule which is handy in nasty weather. Very well made. Popular in Europe.
    • Warmlite 2R – Shed snow well when pitched tight. Good in wind. Middle will sag if not pitched tightly. The 2R is not as tall as I would like if I was going to be spending a lot of time in the tent. The vestibule having a floor was annoying but manageable. They also make tents larger than the 2R. Get a third pole if using size 3.
    • Sierra Designs Stretch Dome… I had the first version. Roomy for 2, usable with three. Mine stood the test of time but was stolen from my car. Not the lightest solution. I continue to be impressed with SD’s commitment to quality and innovation though I haven’t used a modern SD 4-season tent.
    • North Face V24 – Hasn’t been sold for years. Was bombproof and heavy.
    • Sierra Designs 3-Man Tent from the early 1970s… Double walled three person tent which used three strait poles in a tipi like design with a hex floor.  Great size for two in winter, worked for three. Half moon zipper in the floor formed a cookhole for using a stove inside.  Some of my fondest memories are nights I spent in this tent with my dad as storms raged outside.

    I have also used some 3 season tents / tarptents in the winter which worked ok if there was no or small amounts of snow.  When the was enough snow to blow into the shelter through the netting I was unhappy. Anything not protected gets damp.  Those with perimeter netting were a disaster because the netting often frozen into the snow. Not recommended. 

    Whatever you are using a tarp or tent, you need to keep your shelter in place. Typically snow anchors are more effective than stakes for this task. See a nice Snow Anchor Analysis

  • Shelter Fabrics

    Shelters are made from a variety of materials which have a variety of strengths and weaknesses.  One of the important properties of a shelter is being able to keep you dry. Many fabrics, even those that aren’t “waterproof” can keep you drive in moderate conditions. Just think about the materials used in many umbrellas. Storms though can be another story. According to Richard’s post, extreme thunderstorms can generate hydrostatic heads of 12k mm?!, and typhoons can generate 20k mm. Also note that placing weight in a concentrated place (like kneeling) can generate quite a lot of pressure. This is why conventional shelters often had a more waterproof floor than roof.In increasing weight:

    • Dyneema (Cuben): spectra threads embedded between Mylar. Available in 0.36-1.6oz weights. Quite waterproof. Tear strength good (.6) to Excellent (1.6).  Roughly 4x the cost of sil-nylon. Does not stretch when wet.  Not the most abrasive resistant material. Sewing weakens material so best to be taped or glued.
    • Spinnaker: tightly woven polyester which is silicone impregnated. Typically .8-1.1oz weights. Hydrostatic head typically 1400mm (same as sil-nylon). My field experience with spinnaker is that it is better than sil-nylon, and the the spinnaker used by MLD is indeed at least 30% better than any other spinnaker I have encountered.  I have experienced misting through sil-nylon and other companies spinnaker shelters, but I have yet to encourage conditions in the field where rain hits hard enough to mist through MLD spinnaker. In fact, hose with a high speed nozzle didn’t cause misting. Does not stretch when wet.  No abrasive resistant, be careful. Many people find this material noisy when it flaps in the breeze, but I have found that if tautly pitched the noise isn’t an issue.
    • Sil-Nylon: tightly woven nylon which is silicone impregnated. Available in 1.1-2oz weights. High variability is waterproof. Richard suggests that it’s typically 1400mm but heavier weight such as used by GoLite can be close to 3500mm. Will stretch when wet or when the humidity increases so expect to need to retention. Silcone treatment makes the material strong than the nylon left by itself.
    • Sil-Poly: tightly woven polyester which is silicone impregnated. These materials came on the market after a stopped following fabrics closely. Dan Durston explains why he believes Sil-Poly is significantly better than sil-nylon.
    • EPIC: The Black Diamond  Epic tents used the Alpine Summit process fabric. It averages a hydrostatic head of 1,300 mm.
    • Nylon eVENT fabric averages 28,000 mm.
    • Conventional double wall tents typically use 70 denier urethane coated nylon with a 1 oz coating as the fly fabric. It averages a hydrostatic head of 56,275 mm.
  • Selecting Campsites

    PLACEHOLDER

    • Look for someplace with soft ground. Not only is this more comfortable to sleep on, but if it rains, the water will more quickly soak in.
    • Look for someplace that has good drainage: slightly higher than the near by ground, avoid sleeping in depressions.  
    • Make sure you aren’t in the path of runoff if there was a severe storm.
    • By lakes will have more humidity which is normally not a good thing.
    • Under a tree or  on a hill side will typically be warmer than in a valley or the middle of a meadow.
    • Ridge lines are not a good location because of wind and lightning danger.

    Some brief notes by other sectionhikers campsite selection and a thread about selecting sites in the high sierras.

  • Stakes

    Most shelters need something to keep them from blowing away. Most people carry metal or plastic stakes, though it is often possible to improvise using local material. A decent video of the big/little rock anchor is what I often do above treeline. Ultralight backpackers often use titanium stakes because they are strong and reasonably light.

    There is no one best stake.  There are a number of environmental issues which will suggest what might be the most effective stakes. Things I typical consider is the “holding power” of the stake, how easy the stakes will go into the ground, the weight of the stake, and what sort of environmental impact the stake holes might make.

    Holding Power: The looser the ground, the more surface area you need for an equiv hold. If you use two stakes of identical design, the larger on (more surface area) will hold better if you can get it into the ground.  Wide diameter round stakes can work in many conditions, but if you need a lot of holding power, especially in soft ground (sandy, waterlogged, etc), use Y stakes like MSR groundhogs. Some people use V stakes, but I have found that they have a tendency to bent more than most stakes I have tried. In extremely lose soil some people will double stake. At the extreme (sand / snow) you want to use anchors rather than stakes. 

    Easy to Drive: The harder the ground the more you want a strong, thin stake. Many people use titanium sheppard hooks stakes. The one down side of these stakes is that if the ground is very hard, you can’t pound these stakes in, you can only push with your hands. Some people carry one “nail stake” which can be used to get a hole started for a hook stake. Note: Pushing V and Y stakes in can be hard on the hands, so I carry a small plastic PVC tee joint which weights less than .5oz.and saves my palms.

    Durability: The thinner the stake, the more likely it is to bend. Some stakes have been known to break when put under stress, such as the MSR Needle Stakes. The tops of the Easton stakes sometimes comes off. You can epoxy them back on when you get home.

    Weight: If you are shooting for the absolute lightest, titanium stakes might be right for you, but it really depends on the other factors listed above.

    These days I mostly use 6″ easton stakes on 3 season trip because they have pretty good holding power in soft ground because they are wider than my titanium Sheppard’s hooks, and the have a flat head so I can pound them into harder ground with a rock, and they are reasonably light. The only down side is that the epoxy that glues to top to be body can come undone and in extreme cases, they can be broken.  If I am really concerned about holding power (expecting lose soil) I will switch to 9″ easton stakes, or switch to a Y stake.

    Jerry Goller wrote up a more analytical comparision of stakes which I have stashed on my web page and there is a nice article at BPL about tent stake holding power.

    Snow anchors are a good alternative to stakes in the winter or in deep sand.

  • Backpacking

    The following posts can provide an overview for someone who is thinking and trying backcountry / “wild” backpacking for the first time. I plan to write up something about what changes on hut-2-hut, hostel-2-hostel treks, but haven’t gotten around to that yet. For the time being I have notes I wrote up about walking the Camino de Santiago.

    I generally take an ultralight approach to backpacking. There are people who carry less, and carry a lot more than me, but I think most of this information would be useful for any approach. Paul’s outdoor guidebook is more complete than the notes I have written up.

    I have some older web pages which need to be updated, but might have useful bits

    My personal 3 seasons packing list